|
Does
discography injure normal discs? An analysis of repeat discograms. |
|
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: |
Robert H. Dedman Memorial Medical Center, Dallas,
Texas. |
|
SOURCE: |
Spine 1989 Apr;14(4):424-6 |
|
CITATION IDS: |
PMID: 2718046 UI: 89242316 |
|
ABSTRACT: |
This study was done to look for evidence of
damage to a healthy disc resulting from diagnostic discography. Thirty-four patients had
undergone a second discogram at 80 lumbar levels. There were 22 men and 12 women. The mean
interval between discograms was 16.7 months (range, 3-38). Of 42 levels that were reported
to be radiologically normal on the first discogram, ten were reported to be abnormal on
the second discogram (24%). On review of these films, the abnormality was in fact present
on the first discogram at two levels, and the second discogram was normal at two levels
(radiologist error). Fusions had been done in three patients at adjacent levels between
discograms. A compression fracture was present in adjacent vertebrae at two levels. Only
one level was found to be truly abnormal on the second discogram for no obvious reason.
The authors found no evidence that diagnostic discography damaged a normal disc. |
|
MAIN MESH HEADINGS: |
Intervertebral Disk/*radiography
Radiography/*adverse effects |
|
ADDITIONAL MESH HEADINGS: |
Diatrizoate Meglumine/diagnostic use
Female
Human
Lumbar Vertebrae
Male
Time Factors |